Concurrent Strategies in Strength Training, Part 2
By Mladen
Jovanovic
This is part two of a three-part series.
Waves are very similar to pyramids.
Here’s an example of the wide wave loading protocol:
| Set |
Reps |
| Set 1 |
15 reps |
| Set 2 |
10 reps |
| Set 3 |
5 reps |
| Set 4 |
15 reps |
| Set 5 |
10 reps |
| Set 6 |
5 reps |
Stages or plateau loading are a combination of pyramids and straight
sets. Here are a couple of examples:
| Set |
Reps |
| Set 1 |
15 reps |
| Set 2 |
15 reps |
| Set 3 |
10 reps |
| Set 4 |
10 reps |
| Set 5 |
5 reps |
| Set 6 |
5 reps |
|
| Set |
Reps |
| Set 1 |
10 reps |
| Set 2 |
10 reps |
| Set 3 |
10 reps |
| Set 4 |
3 reps |
| Set 5 |
3 reps |
| Set 6 |
3 reps |
|
For more examples regarding loading protocols, I highly recommend
reading Christian Thibaudeau’s, Black Book of Training
Secrets–Enhanced Edition. Most of these graphs are taken from there.
Another interesting book to consider is Joe Kenn’s, Coach’s Strength
Training Playbook, which is another awesome read.
My opinion regarding waves, pyramids, and stages is that they are
very useful when the load stays within 10 percent of 1RM. In other
words, narrow variants are ok. But I think wide variants (those
explained) are mostly crap (although a gross amount of liters still use
it so I guess they haven’t read Zatsiorsky’s book from 95 or Poliquin’s
stuff). It is ok if you utilize reps and loads from two near repetition
zones (ME/SE, SE/RE), but if you try to utilize whole repetition
continuums, I guess you are confusing your body (whatever that would
be). Also, you don’t have appropriate volume within each zone to drain
potential adaptational effects compared to narrow variants. I again
highly suggest looking at Black Book for great ideas on how to
organize narrow variants for different levels of athletes. To conclude,
rep schemes (utilizing whole repetition continuums) on a given exercise
as a form of concurrent training is a bad choice. Avoid it.
Daily undulating periodization (DUP)
The idea of daily undulating periodization (or what is also called
non-linear periodization in some circles) is to basically devote a whole
training session toward a given goal (maximal strength, muscular
hypertrophy, muscular endurance). Suppose you have two different
training sessions—training A and training B.
| Training A |
Training B |
| 1. Squat 2. Bench press
3. Romanian deadlift
4. Pull-ups |
1. Front squat 2. Inclined
bench press
3. Lunges
4. Horizontal rowing |
Now, you identify different training goals that you want to
concurrently (parallel) achieve at the same time. Suppose they are
maximal strength, muscular hypertrophy, and muscular endurance. To
achieve them, you plan to use ME, SE, and RE methods and loading
protocols. Now, you can mix and match and get this kind of training
organization:
| |
Session 1 |
Session 2 |
Session 3 |
Session 4 |
Session 5 |
Session 6 |
| Training |
A |
B |
A |
B |
A |
B |
| Protocol |
ME |
SE |
RE |
ME |
SE |
RE |
| Reps/Sets |
5 X 1–3 |
4 X 6–8 |
3 X 10–12 |
5 X 1–3 |
4 X 6–8 |
3 X 10–12 |
You have six combinations of training sessions combining training A
and B and the three different loading protocols ME, SE, and RE. If you
do three training sessions per week, you have two weeks to pass the full
circle.
This kind of planning allows for week long loading waves (or
undulations) that may provide variety and some kind of integrated
unloading. There are a couple of studies (which I’m too lazy to find)
that show better goal achievement with DUP than with linear (or
traditional) periodization. I don’t want to open a huge can of worms
discussing the study design and subjects, but I guess this kind of
concurrent training organization has its place under the sun for a given
individual aiming to achieve specific goals under a specific situation.
Coach Alwyn Cosgrove believes in DUP. I trust Alwyn Cosgrove. So, I
guess I find DUP a good tool in your toolbox. Use it when you find it
appropriate. To be honest, I haven’t used it yet, not on me, nor on the
people I coach. However, that doesn’t necessarily mean that I will not
use it one day. Now, let’s discuss priority lift strategies.
Priority lifts
I openly admit it. This is my favorite approach to concurrent
strength training. I don’t know if anyone called it priority lifts
before me or if anyone knows what the hell I’m talking about here, but
I’ve called it that somehow. Because we are going to differ between
different exercise categories and give them priorities, I hope that
calling this method priority lifts was a smart idea. If you think it is
not, feel free to contact me and curse me.
According to its importance, each exercise can be classified into a
separate group. Depending on the author, there could be different
classifications of the exercises. For example, Joe Kenn, in his book, The Coach’s Strength Training Playbook, uses the following
classification of exercises:
- Foundation exercises
- Supplemental exercises
- Major assistance exercises
- Secondary assistance exercises
One classification of exercises that I will use here is the
classification that Christian Thibaudeau presented in his series of
articles entitled, “How to Design a Damn Good Program” published at
T-Nation.com. If you haven’t read this series of articles (and actually
everything this guy has ever wrote), you are missing a lot because there
is more practical information in those couple of pages than in 500 plus
pages in a strength training textbook. It is an awesome article and one
of my favorites.
| Exercise classification
by Christian Thibaudeau |
| Primary exercises |
This category includes a small
number of multi-joint, multi-muscle, free weight, and preferably
multi-plane movements. These movements allow you to use the most
weight for each muscle group and place the highest demand on the
body and nervous system. |
| Secondary exercises |
This is similar to the above except
that the exercises in this category place a slightly lower
demand on the body and central nervous system. |
| Auxiliary exercises |
This very broad category includes
the isolation movements and most machine exercises. These
exercises allow the use of considerably less weight than
exercises in the first two categories and so place far less
demand on the nervous system. |
| Remedial exercises |
This category contains movements,
mostly isolation, whose purpose is to correct problems such as
muscle imbalances or very specific weak points. Rotator cuff
work, balance, and proprioception drills also fall into this
category. |
Basically, Joe Kenn and Chris Thibaudeau use the same classification
with some minor differences between groups. Most coaches usually reduce
exercise classification to core and assistance exercises, which is more
practical and easier to use. Again, everything depends on the goal of
training and the context and so does the exercise classification that
you use. If exercises are tools, their classifications can be different
types and organizations of the toolbox. Be flexible with
classifications. They are not set in stone.
According to your sport and goal, different exercises may be
considered under a given group. For example, Olympic lifters may use the
following classifications:
| Olympic lifter |
| Primary exercises |
Clean and jerk, snatch, squat,
deadlift, press, push press |
| Secondary exercises |
Hang clean, hang snatch, high
pulls, front squat |
| Auxiliary exercises |
Romanian deadlifts, lunges,
step-ups, bench press, chins, rows, shrugs |
| Remedial exercises |
Rotator cuff, adductors/abductors,
calves |
This could be an example of exercise classification for a
powerlifter:
| Powerlifter |
| Primary exercises |
Squat, bench press, deadlift |
| Secondary exercises |
Front squat, box squat, sumo
deadlift, good morning; Romanian deadlift, wide/narrow grip
bench press, military press, floor press, chains, bands,
incline/decline bench press |
| Auxiliary exercises |
Pull-through, glute ham raise,
lunges, step-ups, rows, chins, Bulgarians, reverse hypers,
dumbbell variations and isolational stuff (delts, triceps,
biceps, calves) |
| Remedial exercises |
Rotator cuff, shoulder stability
work, TKE |
For an average athlete looking for strength training, the following
classification could be used:
| Athlete |
| Primary exercises |
Clean, squat, deadlift, bench press |
| Secondary exercises |
Front squat, Romanian deadlifts,
lunges, military press, chins, rows, dumbbell variations |
| Auxilary exercises |
Dips, delts, calves, biceps,
triceps, grip |
| Remedial exercises |
Shoulder, ankle, and knee
pre-habilitation, neck |
Please note that different classifications may be used depending on
the weak and strong points of the athlete, his level of development,
training period, emphasis and other stuff. Those classifications are
used to help the coach organize the training system and prioritize
things according to the demands of the sport and position. With average
athletes, the primary exercise would be those that give the most bang
for the buck and have the greatest transfer to the field while other
exercises will aim to assist that transfer and provide whole body
development and injury prevention.
Because exercise categories can (or should?) have their own planning
(different loading, progression, and periodization plans for different
exercise categories and their usage/rotation in the training system),
concurrent training can be easily achieved. For example, a powerlifter
would build explosive strength with DE box squats, chains and bands,
bench presses, and speed deadlifts. He would build maximal strength with
ME squats, presses, and deadlifts and their special variations
(secondary exercises), and he would build muscular hypertrophy with SE
and RE single-leg exercises and dumbbell variations of presses, some
chins, and rows.
With an average athlete, explosive strength would be developed with
Olympic lift variations, plyometrics, and explosive jumps, and maximal
strength would be developed with ME/SE squats, benches, and deadlifts.
Muscular hypetrophy would be developed with SE/RE single leg stuff,
dumbbell variations, isolation stuff, chins, and rows.
In other words, primary exercises may use the ME loading protocol.
Secondary exercises may use the SE loading protocol, and auxiliary and
remedial exercises may use the RE loading protocol to achieve concurrent
training approach.
| Concurrent training
with priority lifts |
| Exercise group |
Training goal |
Loading protocol |
| Primary exercises |
Explosive strength, maximal
strength |
DE, ME |
| Secondary exercises |
Maximal strength, muscular
hypertrophy |
ME, SE |
| Auxiliary exercises |
Muscular hypertrophy, muscular
endurance |
SE, RE |
| Remedial exercises |
Muscular endurance, anatomic
adaptation, pre-habilitation |
RE |
However, if someone wants to nitpick (and that would be me), this can
be considered concurrent training as a whole (because all loading
protocols are present). It may not be considered concurrent training
depending on which movement pattern or muscle groups we are talking
about. For example, in the athlete’s situation mentioned earlier, the
legs would receive explosive strength work, maximal strength work, and
muscular hypertrophy work. The situation is similar for the upper body
“push” muscles, but the upper body “pull” muscles (used for chins and
rows) will receive only muscular hypertrophy work. Ring a bell or not?
To be considered totally concurrent, all movement patterns must
receive the same treatment (ME, SE, and RE work; not necessary for DE)
in a training program or it would be only partially concurrent. For this
reason, most, if not all, concurrent powerlifting, Olympic lifting, and
athletic training programs are partially concurrent because only the
legs and push muscle groups receive concurrent treatment (with the
exception of upper body pull muscles). Is this a bad thing? Certainly
not! I’m just pointing it out, and because most sports revolve around
legs and push muscles, this is a fine situation for me.
However, in bodybuilding, this would under develop certain muscle
groups. That’s for sure. And because goals in athletic training, Olympic
lifting, and powerlifting are not bodybuilding in nature and because I
don’t talk about bodybuilding here (although some ideas can be certainly
used with minor modifications), there shouldn’t be much concern about it
anyway. Certainly, it would be very usable to classify exercises for
every movement pattern (or muscle group) in addition to the sport
classification already explained.
This way we could differ between:
- Sport-based or athletic-oriented classification of exercises
(according to the greatest transfer to the field or event or the
most used muscle groups/movement patterns in sport)
- Movement pattern or muscle group (bodybuilding) based
classification of exercises
Because I’ve already given hypothetical examples of the exercise
classifications for Olympic lifting, powerlifting, and average athletic
training, here is a modified exercise classification based on movement
patterns taken from the already mentioned awesome article by Christian
Thibaudeau, “How to Design a Damn Good Program.”
| Knee dominant pattern
(or quads) |
| Category |
Sample exercises |
| Primary |
Olympic back squat (hip width
stance, upright torso), power squat (wide stance, moderate torso
lean), front squat |
| Secondary |
Lunge variations, split squat
variations, leg press, barbell hack squat, dumbbell squat |
| Auxiliary |
Machine hack squat, step-up
variations, leg extension variations, sissy squat |
| Remedial |
Terminal knee extension (with
band), band leg extension |
| Hip dominant pattern
(or hams/glutes) |
| Category |
Sample exercises |
| Primary |
Deadlift, Romanian deadlift,
stiff-leg deadlift, sumo deadlift, snatch grip deadlift |
| Secondary |
Good morning variations, glute ham
raises, leg press (feet high on pad), single leg Romanian
deadlift |
| Auxiliary |
Reverse hyper, pull-through, leg
curl variations, cable hip extension, hyperextension |
| Remedial |
X-band walks, Cook lift, Swiss ball
leg curl, band leg curl |
| Upper body horizontal
push (or pecs) |
| Category |
Sample exercises |
| Primary |
Bench press |
| Secondary |
Incline bench press, dumbbell bench
press, dumbbell incline press, neck press, plate loaded push-ups |
| Auxiliary |
Cable cross-over, flyes variations,
pec deck machine, chest press machine |
| Remedial |
Swiss ball push-ups, wobble board
push-ups |
| Upper body vertical
pull (or back width, lats, and teres major) |
| Category |
Sample exercises |
| Primary |
Pull-ups, chin-ups |
| Secondary |
Parallel pull-ups, mixed grip
pull-ups, towel pull-ups |
| Auxiliary |
Lat pull-down variations, straight
arm lat pull-down, pull-over |
| Remedial |
External/internal shoulder
rotation, scap push-up |
| Upper body vertical
push (or shoulders/ delts) |
| Category |
Sample exercises |
| Primary |
Military press, push press |
| Secondary |
Press behind the neck, log press,
seated press, dumbbell press variations, Bradford press |
| Auxiliary |
Machine shoulder press, lateral
raise variations, front raise variations, lateral raise machine |
| Remedial |
Cuban press, external shoulder
rotation |
| Upper body horizontal
pull (or back thickness—rear delts, traps, rhomboids) |
| Category |
Sample exercises |
| Primary |
Barbell rowing, log row, chest
supported rowing, seated rowing |
| Secondary |
One-arm dumbbell row, corner row,
fatman pull-ups, dumbbell chest supported rowing |
| Auxiliary |
High pulley cross-rowing, low
pulley cross-row, bent over rear delt raise, machine rear delt,
chest-supported incline rear delt raise |
| Remedial |
Chest-supported incline dumbbell
shrugs, seated cable shrugs (scapular retraction), traps three
raise, YTWL, Cuban row |
| Elbow flexion (or
biceps) |
| Category |
Sample Exercises |
| Primary |
Standing barbell curl, Scott bench
barbell curl |
| Secondary |
Hammer curl, seated dumbbell curl
variations, Scott bench dumbbell curl, reverse barbell curl
(standing or Scott bench), Zottman curl |
| Auxiliary |
Machine curl, cable curl
variations, concentration curl |
| Remedial |
Upper arm supination with
sledgehammer or Thor's hammer |
| Elbow extension (or
triceps) |
| Category |
Sample exercises |
| Primary |
Close grip bench press, close-grip
decline press, triceps dips |
| Secondary |
Close-grip incline press,
reverse-grip bench press, JM press, decline barbell triceps
extension, decline dumbbell triceps extension, flat barbell
triceps extension, flat dumbbell triceps extension |
| Auxiliary |
Overhead dumbbell triceps
extension, overhead bar triceps extension, cable triceps
extension variations, triceps extension machines |
| Remedial |
Close grip push-up on Swiss ball,
close grip push-up on wobble board |
| Total body (Olympic
Lifts) |
| Category |
Sample exercises |
| Primary |
Clean and jerk, snatch |
| Secondary |
Hang clean, hang snatch, push
press, pulls, shrugs |
| Auxiliary |
Jump squats, depth jumps, split
squat jumps, step-up jumps |
| Remedial |
Dumbbell clean and snatch
variations |
Using this movement pattern-based exercise classification, different
goals can be achieved via different distributions of loading protocols.
I will give an example using Chris Thibaudeau’s classification of
loading protocols.
| Distribution of loading
protocols according to the goal selected |
| |
Relative strength |
Absolute strength |
Muscular hypertrophy |
| Primary |
Strength |
Strength |
Functional hypertrophy |
| Secondary |
Strength |
Strength; functional hypertrophy |
Functional hypertrophy; total
hypertrophy |
| Auxiliary |
Strength; functional hypertrophy |
Functional hypertrophy; Total
hypertrophy |
Total hypertrophy |
| Remedial |
Strength endurance |
Strength endurance |
Strength endurance |
The training sessions for intermediate lifters can be easily designed
using the presented information. The attribute, “intermediate” is based
on the work of Mark Rippetoe and Lon Kilgore, authors of Starting
Strength and Practical Programming. Both books are a must in
your training library. For more information, please read my review,
“What I Have Learned from Practical Programming” published at
EliteFTS.com.
I will give two examples aimed at increasing explosive strength (via
Olympic lifts and explosive jumping), maximal strength, and muscular
hypertrophy. One is based on the whole body split and the other is based
on a lower/upper split. Here is the example of the whole body split:
| Whole body: Training
session A |
| |
Movement Pattern |
Category |
Example |
Loading protocol |
| A. |
Total body |
Auxiliary |
Step-up jumps |
DE |
| B. |
Knee dominant |
Primary |
Squat |
ME |
| C1. |
Vertical push |
Primary |
Military press |
ME |
| C2. |
Vertical pull |
Primary |
Chin-ups |
ME |
| D. |
Hip dominant |
Secondary |
Romanian deadlifts |
SE |
| E1. |
Horizontal push |
Auxiliary |
Push-ups |
RE |
| E2. |
Horizontal pull |
Auxiliary |
Cuban row |
RE |
| Whole body: Training
session B |
| |
Movement pattern |
Category |
Example |
Loading protocol |
| A. |
Total body |
Primary |
Clean |
DE/ME |
| B1. |
Horizontal push |
Primary |
Bench press |
ME |
| B2. |
Horizontal pull |
Primary |
Barbell row |
ME |
| C. |
Knee dominant |
Secondary |
Front squat |
SE |
| D1. |
Vertical push |
Secondary |
Dumbbell press |
SE |
| D2. |
Vertical pull |
Secondary |
Pull-ups |
SE |
| E. |
Hip dominant |
Auxiliary |
Single leg Romanian deadlifts |
RE |
| Whole body: Training
session C |
| |
Movement pattern |
Category |
Example |
Loading protocol |
| A. |
Total body |
Secondary |
Hang clean |
DE/SE technique |
| B. |
Hip dominant |
Primary |
Deadlift |
ME |
| C1. |
Horizontal push |
Secondary |
Dumbbell bench press |
SE |
| C2. |
Horizontal pull |
Secondary |
Seated rowing |
SE |
| D. |
Knee dominant |
Auxiliary |
Lunges |
RE |
| E1. |
Vertical push |
Auxiliary |
Dumbbell l-rises |
RE |
| E2. |
Vertical pull |
Auxiliary |
Pull-over |
RE |
Here is the lower/upper split:
| Training A: Lower body
squat |
| |
Movement pattern |
Category |
Example |
Loading protocol |
| A. |
Total body |
Primary |
Clean |
DE/ME |
| B. |
Knee dominant |
Primary |
Squat |
ME |
| C. |
Hip dominant |
Secondary |
Romanian deadlift |
SE |
| D. |
Knee dominant |
Auxiliary |
Lunges |
RE |
| E. |
Abs and pre-habilitation stuff |
|
|
RE |
| Training B: Upper body
horizontal |
| |
Movement pattern |
Category |
Example |
Loading protocol |
| A1. |
Horizontal push |
Primary |
Bench press |
ME |
| A2. |
Horizontal pull |
Primary |
Barbell row |
ME |
| B1. |
Vertical push |
Secondary |
Dumbbell press |
SE |
| B2. |
Vertical pull |
Secondary |
Pull-ups |
SE |
| C1. |
Horizontal push |
Auxiliary |
Push-ups |
RE |
| C2. |
Horizontal pull |
Auxiliary |
Cuban row |
RE |
| Training C: Lower body
deadlift |
| |
Movement pattern |
Category |
Example |
Loading protocol |
| A. |
Total body |
Secondary |
Hang clean |
DE/SE technique |
| B. |
Hip dominant |
Primary |
Deadlift |
ME |
| C. |
Knee dominant |
Secondary |
Front squat |
SE |
| D. |
Hip dominant |
Auxiliary |
Single leg Romanian deadlift
|
RE |
| E. |
Abs and pre-habilitation stuff |
|
|
RE |
| Training D: Upper body
vertical |
| |
Movement pattern |
Category |
Example |
Loading protocol |
| A1. |
Vertical push |
Primary |
Military press |
ME |
| A2. |
Vertical pull |
Primary |
Chin-ups |
ME |
| B1. |
Horizontal push |
Secondary |
Dumbbell bench press |
SE |
| B2. |
Horizontal pull |
Secondary |
Seated rowing |
SE |
| C1. |
Vertical push |
Auxiliary |
L-rises |
RE |
| C2. |
Vertical pull |
Auxiliary |
Pull-over |
RE |
Once we arranged the training sessions, we can plan progressions for
loading protocols.
| Weekly progressions for
loading protocols |
| Loading protocol |
Week 1 |
Week 2 |
Week 3 |
Week 4 unload |
| ME |
5 X 3 |
3, 2, 1, 3, 2, 1 |
6 X 1 |
4 X 1, 10% weight |
| SE |
4 X 6 |
5 X 5 |
5 X 5 |
3 X 5, 10% weight |
| RE |
3 X 12 |
3 X 10 |
3 X 8 |
2 X 10 |
| Olympic lifts |
ME: 5 X 1 SE: 4 X 2
RE: 3 X 5 |
ME: 5 X 1 SE: 4 X 2
RE: 3 X 5 |
ME: 5 X1 SE: 4 X 2
RE: 3 X 5 |
ME: 5 X 1 SE: 4 X 2
RE: 3 X 5 |
Stay tuned for part three!!
Elite Fitness Systems strives to be a recognized leader in the
strength training industry by providing the highest quality strength
training products and services while providing the highest level of
customer service in the industry. For the best training equipment,
information, and accessories, visit us at www.EliteFTS.com.
|