Caveat emptor

I always have said if you want to find out what information you are getting is real or not, FOLLOW THE MONEY. I'm not speaking politics only here. There is a new documentary being aired on Netflix about changing the source of food based on plant v. animal. I know what works and what doesn't for me and most of the people in my care. So while the evidence being aired sounds compelling the easiest thing for me to do is to question How come this and how come now? Who ventures to gain the most from this information? The viewer or the producers While I agree that perhaps we all eat TOO MUCH, I am not certain about the source of my food being awful and needing much of a change. The show was an hour and change about the benefits of a meatless based diet with strong evidence to support the claim. It made me think (and isn't that the purpose???) about switching over to a plant based protein source and overall diet, until I saw that the writers and producers were the ones who happen to own a "plant based" supplement company. Hmmmmm. Heck of a marketing scheme. Always, no matter what, look for the "end run" on information being given out. Who is it that has the most to gain by doing so? I think perhaps cutting back some and balancing the sources of food might be a better plan. But heck, where's the fun and the selling point of taking a moderation plan? Caveat emptor     Today's Training: Concept II Row: 30:00 Straight Leg Dead Lift from at the knee pin pulls: 5x12x50% of 2 RM GHR: 3x15 Reverse Hyper: 3x15 Shrugs: 3x15