By Marília Coutinho, Ph.D.

For some time, my husband had been saying that I needed a “Reverse Hyper Extension”. After a particularly painful flare-up, I finally gave in and looked it up: it was time to learn more about the machine I never managed to use at any gym because I was too short for them. Luckily, YouTube taught me several ways to improvise alternatives.

The invention and popularization of the reverse hyperextension machine™ are almost universally credited to the late Louie Simmons, the founder of Westside Barbell™ in Columbus, Ohio. Since then, equipment designed according to some of the same principles has been developed.

Having written for Elitefts for nine years, I knew that Louie invented the Reverse Hyperextension Machine™. What I didn't expect was to find academic research on it. Why would there be? It's just another gym machine. One that a bunch of users claim is a miracle for their recovery, but does its recognition go beyond a niche community?

To my surprise, it does. A modest body of research has emerged, confirming the hypotheses put forward by the inventor himself. This is a small but powerful instance of an invention preceding the research that explains it.

In the history of technology, innovation often precedes research [1]. One example is the steam engine, which Thomas Newcomen developed in the 18th century through trial and error [2, 3, 4]. Decades later, scientists like James Watt and Nicolas Carnot formalized the principles of thermodynamics, explaining their function [5, 6]. The Edison Effect followed a similar path; Thomas Edison patented the observation, but it was later research by John Ambrose Fleming that developed it into the vacuum tube, which launched the electronics industry [7, 8, 9]. Likewise, the accidental discovery of penicillin by Alexander Fleming [1, 10] preceded the systematic research in the 1940s that finally purified and developed it into a life-saving drug [1]. This historical effect is manifested, at a different scale, in the story of the reverse hyperextension machine.

After suffering devastating back injuries in the 1970s and '80s that doctors told him would end his lifting career, Louie Simmons developed the first reverse hyper machine out of pure necessity. Frustrated with ineffective traditional rehabilitation, he experimented with his own device to decompress his spine and strengthen his posterior chain without compressive loads. He found that the movement not only alleviated his pain but also increased his squat and deadlift strength, making it a cornerstone of the Westside Barbell training system. For decades, the machine’s use was confined to the powerlifting crowd before the scientific community began to provide a body of evidence that validates its unique biomechanical and therapeutic benefits.

Research on the Effects of the Reverse Hyper.

Research has identified several key effects of using this machine. One of the most significant benefits is its ability to create gentle spinal decompression and traction [11, 12]. The swinging motion of the legs can produce a “small but important distraction of the vertebral bodies,” which helps to hydrate the intervertebral discs and alleviate pressure [13, 14]. This is in sharp contrast to traditional hyperextension exercises that compress the spine. The rhythmic movement promotes imbibition (fluid exchange), which is crucial for delivering nutrients to the avascular spinal discs and aiding in their health and recovery [5].

Furthermore, electromyography (EMG) research has confirmed that the RHE is exceptionally effective in activating the entire posterior chain [15, 16]. Studies show high levels of muscle activation in the gluteus maximus, biceps femoris (hamstrings), and erector spinae (lower back) [11, 17, 18]. The unique arc of the movement trains these muscles through a full range of motion, making it a valuable tool for both strength and hypertrophy. Research has also shown that the RHE can significantly increase glute and hamstring activation compared to other common exercises, such as the Romanian deadlift [19]. The RHE's design, which supports the torso, places less compressive and shear force on the lumbar spine compared to exercises like back extensions or deadlifts [11, 16, 20]. This makes it an invaluable tool for safely strengthening the lower back and posterior chain, particularly for individuals with a history of back injury or chronic low back pain [21, 22].

Based on this evidence, the benefits of the posterior chain/reverse hyperextension machine can be categorized as a rehabilitation and prehabilitation tool, as well as a performance enhancement tool.

The invention of Louie Simmon's Rever Hyperextension Machine is an example of the fertilization of gym lab and practice theory, a concept that, in lip service, is considered highly desirable by everyone: science, the practice fields, and society. I began lifting later in life, in my 40s, after having already published and taught on the history of science and technology. From the moment I first started lifting seriously and met serious lifters, I wondered why that effect didn’t happen more often. At the weight rooms all over the world, I saw curious people constructing hypotheses and testing them - sometimes quite recklessly, but still, testing them. They arrived at fascinating conclusions, but never had help moving from there to the cycle of inquiry and invention. I wish more gym experimentation had led to things like the hyperextension machine, or at least to a better understanding of our peculiar central fatigue. That being said, hail to Louie, the one whose innovation finally landed at the lab.

References

The New Atlantis. (n.d.). The science before the war. Retrieved from https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-science-before-the-war
American InterContinental University. (n.d.). The Evolution of Technology: Transforming Our World. Retrieved from https://www.aiu.edu/blog/the-evolution-of-technology-transforming-our-world/
Hatcher, J. (2011). Technology and the Industrial Revolution. History Compass, 9(9), 693-706. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2011.01386.x
Br, R. J. (2010). The Industrial Revolution was a period of change. Retrieved from https://richardjohnbr.wordpress.com/2010/10/13/industrial-revolution-nature-of-change/
Hunt, B. (n.d.). Technology and science in the 19th century. Not Even Past. Retrieved from https://notevenpast.org/bruce-hunt-technology-science-19c/
Philosophy of Technology: 5 Questions. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://dokumen.pub/philosophy-of-technology-5-questions-9788799101382-8799101386.html
Reddit. (n.d.). What technology was considered a solution in search of a problem? Retrieved from https://www.reddit.com/r/AskEngineers/comments/1flyr34/what_technology_was_considered_a_solution_looking/
Soni, N., & Varghese, J. (2021). Innovation and serendipity in medicine. Journal of Health and Social Sciences, 6(1), 101-105. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7873668/
Mapcon. (n.d.). The vacuum tube in computer history. Retrieved from https://www.mapcon.com/us-en/the-vacuum-tube-in-computer-history
The London School of Economics and Political Science. (n.d.). Innovations are rarely, if ever, the product of a single individual. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2016/08/23/innovations-are-rarely-if-ever-the-product-of-a-single-individual/
Lawrence, M. A., & Somma, M. J. (2019). Biomechanical comparison of the reverse hyperextension and the traditional hyperextension. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 33(8), 2053–2061. https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/fulltext/2019/08000/biomechanical_comparison_of_the_reverse.2.aspx
Westside Barbell. (n.d.). Professional healthcare: Reverse hyperextension and increase back health. Retrieved from https://www.westside-barbell.com/blogs/the-blog/professional-health-care-reverse-hyper-restore-and-increase-back-health
Paoli, A., Musumeci, G., Lomonaco, T., & Gigliotti, I. (2023). Electromyography and kinematics of the reverse hyperextension exercise at different hip flexion angles. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 63(4), 488–495. doi:10.3390/ijerph20126135
Garage Gym Reviews. (n.d.). Reverse hyperextension. Retrieved from https://www.garagegymreviews.com/reverse-hyperextension
Contreras, B. (2013). An EMG Analysis of the Reverse Hyperextension. Retrieved from https://bretcontreras.com/an-emg-analysis-of-the-reverse-hyperextension/
Cuthbert, M., Ripley, N. J., Suchomel, T. J., Alejo, R., McMahon, J. J., & Comfort, P. (2021). Electromyographical differences between the hyperextension and reverse-hyperextension. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 35(6), 1477–1483. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34027916/
Dicus, J. R., Ellestad, S. H., Sheaffer, J. E., Weber, C. A., Novak, N. C., & Holmstrup, M. E. (2023). A comparison of muscle recruitment across three straight-legged, hinge-pattern resistance training exercises. International Journal of Exercise Science, 16(4), 12–22. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7873668/
Marchetti, P. H., & Willardson, J. M. (2014). A comparison of muscle activation between the back squat and reverse hyperextension. Journal of Australian Strength & Conditioning, 22(1), 16–22.
TrainHeroic. (n.d.). Reverse hypers. Retrieved from https://www.trainheroic.com/blog/reverse-hypers/
Hansen Athletics. (n.d.). Benefits of the reverse hyper extension and alternative ways to perform. Retrieved from https://hansenathletics.com/blog/2019/2/15/benefits-of-the-reverse-hyper-extension-and-alternative-ways-to-perform
Wyssard. (n.d.). Medical innovations that started as accidents but transformed healthcare. Retrieved from https://www.wissard.org/medical-innovations-that-started-as-accidents-but-transformed-healthcare/
Gwern. (n.d.). Timing. Retrieved from https://gwern.net/timing
ScienceDirect. (n.d.). The realm of the barely feasible: Innovation at DARPA. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497214000704
BarBend. (n.d.). Reverse hyperextension benefits. Retrieved from https://barbend.com/reverse-hyperextensions-benefits/